I'm going to skip out on making an extended blog post and, instead, make a statement using recent events in my inner circle.
My dear best friend "Sam", who has been thus far the primary figurehead for Steel Owls, has decided that he will cease making videos and lectures on his YouTube channel. This may not seem like a big deal to an outsider, but what is contained in this story is more important than what actually happened.
Standing before a camera and making statements on
controversial issues is not an easy thing to do, especially when you,
early on, catch the attention of a wide variety of dissenting opinions
and groups who stand for everything opposite to what you do. In other
words, very early on, Sam caught the attention of people who would
immediately hate him. He made one video on a sketchy topic, race realism, and this attracted the crowd of opposing views (the race realists). After about a month, one figurehead for race realists made an excessively long video in response to him. Sam made another video in response where he refuted the arguments, and then stated he would probably not make another video response if the debate continued. About a month later, the other guy made another video response. Now Sam has decided to abandon his channel. It seems obvious why, right? It would be hasty to make that decision, though, without hearing what Sam had to say in his "Signing Off" video.
Sam has recently discovered that he could very well have an anxiety
disorder. Anxiety disorders can be very taxing on the mind and body -
they can cause muscle aches, indigestion, loss of sleep, panic attacks,
and much more. The stress he got from these online arguments ended up taking time away
from his work, family, friends, and girlfriend of over 2 years. Based on this, and the medical implications, Sam decided it would be best to abandon his channel and avoid debates and drama on YouTube. I'd say this is a sound decision even without a medical condition.
Here's a thought that popped into everyone's mind, though: if he's having anxiety problems from this debate, it means he's either emotionally invested in the debate, or he knows he lost, or was proven to be dishonest. To everyone, including myself, this would be a reasonable conclusion. He could've simply made up the fact that he was originally planning to respond. As I've discovered, this couldn't be further from the truth.
He shared with me the script he would've used to make his response video. It's a work in progress, and when a person sends him a private message asking a question about the debate, he takes his replies and adds them to the script appropriately. I read it, and I was absolutely shocked. The script wasn't just a substantial, sufficient response. Had he actually made the video, he would've absolutely killed the opposing arguments.
Had he replied, it would've been the end.
So, why didn't he do it?
- For consistency.
- For his health.
- For the people he cares about.
- For his work.
To me, such a resistance of temptation and definite victory for the reasons listed is one of the greatest signs of maturity.
But let's be fair. What responses did the dissenting voices make?
- Derogatory videos.
- Ad hominems.
- Condescending comments.
- Skepticism over whether or not he really does have anxiety issues.
In reality, it's pretty obvious who won this debate.